Marsela, Merry (2022) DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK STRATEGY TO ENHANCE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM 2172121019 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (95kB) | Preview
2. NIM 2172121019 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (472kB) | Preview
3. NIM 2172121019 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (150kB) | Preview
4. NIM 2172121019 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version
Download (122kB) | Preview
5. NIM 2172121019 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version
Download (88kB) | Preview
6. NIM 2172121019 TFIGURES.pdf - Published Version
Download (97kB) | Preview
7. NIM 2172121019 TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (32kB) | Preview
8. NIM 2172121019 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (96kB) | Preview
9. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (443kB) | Preview
13. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (152kB) | Preview
14. NIM 2172121019 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version
Download (335kB) | Preview
Abstract
The aim of this study was to apply Direct and Indirect feedback strategies to
enhance the students’ ability in writing recount text in MAN 1 Medan. The
teacher applied the direct and indirect feedback strategy to indicate the students’
errors in their writing, and identify the realization of these feedback strategies.
This study was conducted by using Qualitative Research Methodology by Miles,
Huberman and Saldana (2014). The data of this study were the words of direct and
indirect feedback strategy from the teacher on students’ writing in recount text
and interview transcript. The sources of data in this research were the students’
writing in recount text and interviewees. The interviewees were an English
teacher and the students in X Science class that consist of 18 students. The data
were collected by using observation, document and interview. The findings
showed that NK applied direct feedback by using error correction form. The
teacher crossed the errors and provided the correct form. In indirect feedback NK
used diverse codes based on the students’ error. In realization, the students said
direct feedback was easier to understand than Indirect Feedback. Direct Feedback
Strategy was most effective on non-grammatical structures and Indirect Feedback
Strategy was more effective in reducing learners’ errors on various components of
the language, it will be used in the long-term and can enhance the students’
writing skills
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Keywords: | Direct Feedback, Indirect Feedback, Recount Text, Qualitative Research Methodology |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mrs Yuni Chairani |
Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2024 01:27 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2024 01:27 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/54739 |