DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK STRATEGY TO ENHANCE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT

Marsela, Merry (2022) DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK STRATEGY TO ENHANCE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[thumbnail of 1. NIM 2172121019 COVER.pdf]
Preview
Text
1. NIM 2172121019 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (95kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 2. NIM 2172121019 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf]
Preview
Text
2. NIM 2172121019 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (472kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 3. NIM 2172121019 ABSTRACT.pdf]
Preview
Text
3. NIM 2172121019 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (150kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 4. NIM 2172121019 PREFACE.pdf]
Preview
Text
4. NIM 2172121019 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (122kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 5. NIM 2172121019 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf]
Preview
Text
5. NIM 2172121019 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version

Download (88kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 6. NIM 2172121019 TFIGURES.pdf]
Preview
Text
6. NIM 2172121019 TFIGURES.pdf - Published Version

Download (97kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 7. NIM 2172121019 TABLES.pdf]
Preview
Text
7. NIM 2172121019 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (32kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 8. NIM 2172121019 APPENDICES.pdf]
Preview
Text
8. NIM 2172121019 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (96kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 9. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER I.pdf]
Preview
Text
9. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (443kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 13. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER V.pdf]
Preview
Text
13. NIM 2172121019 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (152kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 14. NIM 2172121019 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf]
Preview
Text
14. NIM 2172121019 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (335kB) | Preview

Abstract

The aim of this study was to apply Direct and Indirect feedback strategies to
enhance the students’ ability in writing recount text in MAN 1 Medan. The
teacher applied the direct and indirect feedback strategy to indicate the students’
errors in their writing, and identify the realization of these feedback strategies.
This study was conducted by using Qualitative Research Methodology by Miles,
Huberman and Saldana (2014). The data of this study were the words of direct and
indirect feedback strategy from the teacher on students’ writing in recount text
and interview transcript. The sources of data in this research were the students’
writing in recount text and interviewees. The interviewees were an English
teacher and the students in X Science class that consist of 18 students. The data
were collected by using observation, document and interview. The findings
showed that NK applied direct feedback by using error correction form. The
teacher crossed the errors and provided the correct form. In indirect feedback NK
used diverse codes based on the students’ error. In realization, the students said
direct feedback was easier to understand than Indirect Feedback. Direct Feedback
Strategy was most effective on non-grammatical structures and Indirect Feedback
Strategy was more effective in reducing learners’ errors on various components of
the language, it will be used in the long-term and can enhance the students’
writing skills

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Keywords: Direct Feedback, Indirect Feedback, Recount Text, Qualitative Research Methodology
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Yuni Chairani
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2024 01:27
Last Modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:27
URI: https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/54739

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item