Lubis, Nazriani (2015) THE REALIZATION OF GENDER ARGUMENTS IN TWITTER. Masters thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM. 8106111024 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (49kB) | Preview
2. NIM. 8106111024 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (149kB) | Preview
3. NIM. 8106111024 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (67kB) | Preview
4. NIM. 8106111024 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.pdf - Published Version
Download (106kB) | Preview
5. NIM. 8106111024 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version
Download (180kB) | Preview
6. NIM. 8106111024 LISTS OF TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (46kB) | Preview
7. NIM. 8106111024 LISTS OF ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version
Download (45kB) | Preview
8. NIM. 8106111024 LISTS OF DIAGRAMS.pdf - Published Version
Download (45kB) | Preview
9. NIM. 8106111024 LISTS OF MATRIXS.pdf - Published Version
Download (59kB) | Preview
10. NIM. 8106111024 LISTS OF APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (46kB) | Preview
11. NIM. 8106111024 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (129kB) | Preview
15. NIM. 8106111024 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (63kB) | Preview
16. NIM. 8106111024 REFERENCES.pdf - Published Version
Download (68kB) | Preview
Abstract
This research deals with the realization of gender arguments in Twitter. The objectives of the research were to identify the types of arguments used by male and female across gender and social status and to find out the factor underlying these types occured in that way. To achieve the objectives, this research was conducted by applying descriptive qualitative design. The subject of this research was the three different social status males and females. The pair interaction was appeared to conduct this research, namely; female to male interaction and female to female interaction across social status. The data was collected from the tweets with three different topics (death penalty, law and education) which posted on twitter by all the subjects. The data was analyzed by applying Mile’s ajd Hubberman’s model. The finding showed that males to female interaction argued by three type of arguments; conjunction, conditional and biconditional, female female to female interaction argued by all types of arguments; negation, disjunction, conjunction, conditional and biconditional, males were siginificantly are more aware with their status in establishing and maintaning the interaction than female, those were more considarate with their interlocutors.
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 401.430 143 Lub r |
Keywords: | Nature of gender; Gender arguments; Computer mediated communication; Twitter |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar T Technology > T Technology (General) > T58.5 Information technology |
Divisions: | Program Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mrs Siti Nurbaidah |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2016 18:39 |
Last Modified: | 01 May 2016 18:39 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/5027 |