Dosma Mutiara, Purba (2017) AN ANALYSIS CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH SUBJECT AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM 2123321022 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (141kB) | Preview
2. NIM 2123321022 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (565kB) | Preview
3. NIM 2123321022 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (128kB) | Preview
4. NIM 2123321022 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version
Download (311kB) | Preview
5. NIM 2123321022 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version
Download (237kB) | Preview
6. NIM 2123321022 TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (191kB) | Preview
7. NIM 2123321022 ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version
Download (126kB) | Preview
8. NIM 2123321022 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (126kB) | Preview
9. NIM 2123321022 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (344kB) | Preview
13. NIM 2123321022 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (91kB) | Preview
14. NIM 2123321022 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version
Download (148kB) | Preview
Abstract
This study focuses on analyzing the process of classroom interaction through
Flanders Interaction Analysis Category (FIAC) model. The objective was to
decsribe how the teacher and students use the categories of classroom interaction
in English class by using Flanders Interaction Analysis Category (FIAC) model.
The data were found based on the data transcription . the source of the data were
the utterances between English teacher and 10th grade students at SMA N 2
Doloksanggul. The technique for the data collection was video recording. The
data analysis applied descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the total
percentage each categories classroom interaction were Accepts Feeling (1.1%),
Praise and Encourages (2.4%), Accepts Ideas of Students (1.2%), Asks Questions
(18.8%), Lecturing (25%), Giving Directions (17.8%), Critizising or justifying
authority (2%), Student Talk Response (15.3%), Student Talk Initation (1.9%),
Silence or Confusion (14.5%). The dominant category of Teacher Talk in English
classroom interaction at SMA N 2 Doloksanggul was Lecturing (25%). While the
dominat category of Students Talk was Students Talk Response (15.3%).
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | SK-2017 ENG 095 |
Keywords: | Teacher Talk, Student Talk, Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC) Model |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1050 Educational Psychology L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mr Maknun |
Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2017 09:05 |
Last Modified: | 10 Aug 2017 04:16 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/25473 |