Batubara, Amna Apriany Delima (2017) LEXICAL DENSITY AND GRAMMATICAL INTRICACY OF READING MATERIALS IN ENGLISH IN FOCUS TEXTBOOK FOR FIRST GRADE OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM. 2123321003 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (129kB) | Preview
2. NIM. 2123321003 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (358kB) | Preview
3. NIM. 2123321003 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (193kB) | Preview
4. NIM. 2123321003 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version
Download (235kB) | Preview
5. NIM. 2123321003 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version
Download (167kB) | Preview
6. NIM. 2123321003 ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version
Download (123kB) | Preview
7. NIM. 2123321003 TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (124kB) | Preview
8. NIM. 2123321003 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (553kB) | Preview
12. NIM. 2123321003 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (168kB) | Preview
13. NIM. 2123321003 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version
Download (340kB) | Preview
Abstract
This study aims to find out the lexical density and grammatical intricacy of
English reading texts in the textbook for the 1st grade of junior hih school to
measure the difficulty of the text. The objectives of the study are to find out the
lexical density and grammtical intricacy which formed in the reading texts of
English in Focus Textbookwhich has the highest both of lexical density and
grammatical intricacy. This study was conducted by descriptive method with
qualitative research. The data of this research were the English reading texts of
English in Focus Textbook for First Junior High School. The data were text
analyzed by using Halliday’s theory. The result of this study; 1).Lexical density
formed of the texts was high based on Halliday’s theory that the texts had more
lexical item than grammatical item, Text 1 was 57.31%, Text 2 was 70.83%, Text
3 was 68.75%, Text 4 was 61.36%, Text 5 was 58.82%, Text 6 was 60.86%, Text
7 was 69.23%, Text 8 was 71.42%. Grammatical Intricacy formed of the texts was
high based on Halliday’s theory that the texts had more complex clauses than
simple clause, Text 1 was 7, Text 2 was 4, Text 3 was 2.16, Text 4 was 2, Text 5
was 1.08, Text 6 was 1.75, Text 7 was 2, Text 8 was 2. 2).Lexical density
influences the difficulty of reading texts if it has higher proportion of lexical items
than grammatical items. While grammaticcal intricacy also influences the
difficulty of reading texts if it has higher proportion of complex clauses in
comparison with simple clauses. 3).The length of the sentence did not influence
the grammatical intricacy of the texts but the more complex clauses and content
carrying lexical items could make the reader difficult to process the texts.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | SK-2017 ENG 019 |
Keywords: | Lexical Density, Grammatical Intricacy, English Reading Texts |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice) > LB1049 Reading (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education L Education > LT Textbooks |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mr Maknun |
Date Deposited: | 06 Mar 2017 02:15 |
Last Modified: | 06 Mar 2017 02:15 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/23560 |