Sari, Puspita (2025) LANGUAGE FEATURES ON THE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING. Masters thesis, Universitas Negeri Medan.
8216112003_Cover.pdf
Download (178kB)
8216112003_Lembar_Pengesahan.pdf
Download (885kB)
8216112003_Abstrak.pdf
Download (201kB)
8216112003_Kata_Pengantar.pdf
Download (132kB)
8216112003_Daftar_Isi.pdf
Download (175kB)
8216112003_Daftar_Tabel.pdf
Download (108kB)
8216112003_Daftar_Gambar.pdf
Download (99kB)
8216112003_Daftar_Lampiran.pdf
Download (99kB)
8216112003_BAB_I.pdf
Download (367kB)
8216112003_BAB_II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB)
8216112003_BAB_III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (289kB)
8216112003_BAB_IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (2MB)
8216112003_BAB_V.pdf
Download (167kB)
8216112003_Daftar_Pustaka.pdf
Download (260kB)
8216112003_Lampiran.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (7MB)
Abstract
The study focused on describing how language features were used on the critical thinking skills of both male and female students when they wrote argumentative writing and explaining why language features were used on the critical thinking skills of male and female students in argumentative writing. Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) by Halliday (1994) was implemented to describe language features used and collaborated with Bloom's Taxonomy (1956) which stated that High Order Critical Thinking Skills (HOTS) divided cognitive skills into six levels: a) remember, b) understand, c) apply, d) analyze, e) evaluate, and f) create. These levels were classified from lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) to higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) (Sabir et al., 2024; Aprilia et al., 2024; Кaбышева,
2023). According to the theory and research purpose, qualitative research design was implemented by using Biklen's inductive approach (2007), which involved analyzing the data in stages: thematic coding, gender comparison, triangulation, and interpretative analysis. The study was mostly about students in Grade XI at SMK Telkom 2 Medan. The writer used a purposive sampling method (Teddlie & Yu: 2007) to choose 30 participants, 15 male and 15 female students. Understanding these differences can help teachers plan lessons and design curricula that will help all students improve their critical thinking skills
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | language features, critical thinking, genders, argumentative writing |
| Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education > LB2361 Curriculum P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris - (S2) |
| Depositing User: | Mrs Catur Dedek Khadijah |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2026 06:42 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Feb 2026 06:42 |
| URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/65974 |
