Analysis of Student Response to Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Descriptive Text

Emalia, Kurnia Ananda (2022) Analysis of Student Response to Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Descriptive Text. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[thumbnail of 1. NIM 2183321014 COVER.pdf] Text
1. NIM 2183321014 COVER.pdf

Download (346kB)
[thumbnail of 2. NIM 2183321014 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf] Text
2. NIM 2183321014 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf

Download (679kB)
[thumbnail of 3. NIM 2183321014 ABSTRACT.pdf] Text
3. NIM 2183321014 ABSTRACT.pdf

Download (432kB)
[thumbnail of 4. NIM 2183321014 PREFACE.pdf] Text
4. NIM 2183321014 PREFACE.pdf

Download (372kB)
[thumbnail of 5. NIM 2183321014 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf] Text
5. NIM 2183321014 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf

Download (498kB)
[thumbnail of 6. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO TABLES.pdf] Text
6. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO TABLES.pdf

Download (328kB)
[thumbnail of 7. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO FIGURES.pdf] Text
7. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO FIGURES.pdf

Download (210kB)
[thumbnail of 8. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO APPENDICES.pdf] Text
8. NIM 2183321014 LIST FO APPENDICES.pdf

Download (327kB)
[thumbnail of 9. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER I.pdf] Text
9. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER I.pdf

Download (498kB)
[thumbnail of 10. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER II.pdf] Text
10. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 11. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER III.pdf] Text
11. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (496kB)
[thumbnail of 12. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER IV.pdf] Text
12. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of 13. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER V.pdf] Text
13. NIM 2183321014 CHAPTER V.pdf

Download (383kB)
[thumbnail of 14. NIM 2183321014 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf] Text
14. NIM 2183321014 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf

Download (548kB)
[thumbnail of 15. NIM 2183321014 ENDCLOSURE.pdf] Text
15. NIM 2183321014 ENDCLOSURE.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (5MB)

Abstract

The goals of this research are to describe students’ responses to teacher written corrective
feedback in their descriptive texts and to discover types of written corrective feedback used
by the teacher. Descriptive qualitative was used as the research methodology. The subjects of
the study are a seventh year class of SMP Negeri 1 Tanjung Beringin consisting of 16
students and an English teacher. Open-ended interview and documentation review as the
research instruments to collect the data. Result of the study revealed that (1) The students
showed positive responses to teacher’s written corrective feedback. (a) They said that teacher
written corrective feedback is a good thing to do. (b) They felt pleased when their descriptive
texts being given teacher’s wtitten corrective feedback. (c) teacher’s written corrective
feedback could make them motivated in writing. (d) They hoped the teacher always had
provided their writing errors with written corrective feedback. (d) direct written corrective
feedback being the most prefered teacher’s feedback by the students. and (2) From three
types of written corrective feedback (metalinguistic, direct and indirect), teacher only used
two of them, namely direct and indirect written corrective feedback in the students’
descriptive texts.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Keywords: Student’s response; Teacher’s written corrective feedback; Assesment; Descriptive Text
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Ricky Syahrizal
Date Deposited: 25 Jul 2025 03:20
Last Modified: 25 Jul 2025 03:20
URI: https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/64368

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item