I SPOKE ENGLISH OR I SPEAKED ENGLISH? : ACCURACY VS FLUENCY

Ariatna (2014) I SPOKE ENGLISH OR I SPEAKED ENGLISH? : ACCURACY VS FLUENCY. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 12 (01). pp. 1242-1247. ISSN 2085-9848-p ; 2579-552X-e

[thumbnail of Fulltext.pdf]
Preview
Text
Fulltext.pdf - Published Version

Download (90kB) | Preview

Abstract

The popularity of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) as a dominant paradigm in English Language Teaching has now been challenged. The opponents of CLT argue thatsecond language learning is not possible with only a focus on function (communication). They maintain that success in second language learning is also determined by a focus on form (grammar). These renewed calls for accuracy-based teaching are commonly referred to as Form-Focused Instruction (FFI).
This essay will discuss the role of form and function in teaching English as a second language. Taking the description of form and function as a beginning point, the writer will further consider a number of explanations of CLT and FFI to support the notion that bothlanguage form and function are related and complement each other in terms of second language learning success.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Teaching methods; Communicative language teaching; Grammar
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice)
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P95 Oral communication. Speech
P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Harly Christy Siagian
Date Deposited: 29 Aug 2022 08:20
Last Modified: 29 Aug 2022 08:20
URI: https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/47671

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item