Hutabarat, Sharon (2021) English Teachers Questions in Promoting Students Thinking Skill at SMK Negeri 10 Medan. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Negeri Medan.
1. NIM 2163121040 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (103kB) | Preview
2. NIM 2163121040 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (656kB) | Preview
3. NIM 2163121040 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (145kB) | Preview
4. NIM 2163121040 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version
Download (118kB) | Preview
5. NIM 2163121040 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version
Download (126kB) | Preview
6. NIM 2163121040 LIST OF TABLE.pdf - Published Version
Download (84kB) | Preview
7. NIM 2163121040 LIST OF FIGURE.pdf - Published Version
Download (38kB) | Preview
8. NIM 2163121040 LIST OF APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (107kB) | Preview
9. NIM 2163121040 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (368kB) | Preview
13. NIM 2163121040 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (146kB) | Preview
14. NIM 2163121040 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version
Download (210kB) | Preview
Abstract
This study deals with teachers’ questions in promoting students’ thinking skill. The objectives of this study were to reveal the types of questions based on taxonomy that teachers used in classroom communicative practices and how the teachers employed strategies to stimulate students’ responses towards the teachers’ questions. A descriptive qualitative design was used in this study. The data was collected by observing two teachers in two classes of grade twelve. The findings of this study showed that the teachers used all of questions types. The type of teachers’ questions which were commonly used by the two teachers is Productive Questions. The cognitive domain which can be achieved from productive categories is creating level. Teacher A mostly used evaluative question. The cognitive domain which can be achieved from evaluative category is evaluating level. While, Teacher B mostly used productive questions. The cognitive domain which can be achieved from productive category is creating level. Furthermore, the less questions appearing is Empirical Question. So, the researcher can conclude that teachers’ questions can promote higher order questions instead of lower order questions. In addition, the two teachers used some strategies to stimulate students’ responses towards the teachers’ questions. Teacher A used rephrasing strategy, simplification strategy, decomposition strategy, and probing strategy, while Teacher B used rephrasing strategy, repetition strategy, and decomposition strategy.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Keywords: | Teachers Questions; Teachers Questions Types; Question Strategies |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB3011 School management and discipline > LB3050 Educational tests, measurements, evaluations and examinations P Language and Literature > PE English |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mrs Elsya Fitri Utami |
Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2022 15:07 |
Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2022 15:07 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/45430 |