Octavia, Friska (2017) TEACHER TALK IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION USING SINCLAIR AND COULTHARD MODEL. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM 2133121029 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (46kB) | Preview
2. NIM 2133121029 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (552kB) | Preview
3. NIM 2133121029 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version
Download (175kB) | Preview
4. NIM 2133121029 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version
Download (224kB) | Preview
5. NIM 2133121029 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version
Download (219kB) | Preview
6. NIM 2133121029 ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version
Download (171kB) | Preview
7. NIM 2133121029 TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (110kB) | Preview
8. NIM 2133121029 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (110kB) | Preview
9. NIM 2133121029 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (335kB) | Preview
13. NIM 2133121029 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (202kB) | Preview
14. NIM 2133121029 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version
Download (294kB) | Preview
Abstract
This study deals with teacher talk in English classroom interaction. The objectives of the study were: (a) to find out the types of moves found in the teacher talk used in English classroom interaction based on Sinclair and Coulthard model, and (b) to describe how the types of moves are realized in the teacher talk used in English
classroom interaction based in Sinclair and Coulthard model. The design used in this study was qualitative research. The data of this study was the teacher’s
utterances. The data was collected by using audio recording and video recording. The data analysis of this study were based on Sinclair and Coulthard model as the
following: (a) to find out the types of moves found in the teacher talk, and (b) to describe how the types of moves are realized in the teacher talk used in English
classroom interaction. Based on the analysis of the data, the findings were shown as the following: (a) there were four types of moves found in the teacher talk, namely: opening, follow-up, framing and focusing, (b) the types of moves found in the teacher talk were mostly realized by h. When the teacher got no response or got a wrong answer from the students, then the structure given was (s) h (post-h) (sel), the follow-up moves were mostly realized by (pre-h) h, the framing moves were realized by h q and the focusing moves were realized by h. Based on the analysis of the data, some conclusions can be presented as the following: (a) the types of moves found in the teacher talk were opening, follow-up, framing and
focusing, while the answering moves were not found in the teacher talk, which indicates that the classroom is not effective because there is no initiation from the
students, (b) the moves found in the teacher talk were mostly realized by h. When the teacher got no response or got a wrong answer from the students, then the structure given was (s) h (post-h) (sel), the follow-up moves were mostly realized by (pre-h) h, the framing moves were realized by h q and the focusing moves were realized by h. Therefore, to create an effective English classroom, teacher should be able to recognize the moves she applies in her talk
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | SK-2018 ENG 009 |
Keywords: | Teacher talk, Classroom interaction, Move, Sinclair and Coulthard |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P95 Oral communication. Speech P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN4177 Debating |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mr Fifri Juanda Harahap |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jan 2018 16:48 |
Last Modified: | 18 Feb 2019 03:45 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/29071 |