Manurung, Nomita Herlina (2017) AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL FEATURES IN REPORT TEXT BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF ACCOUNTING MAJOR AT SMK N 1 JORLANG HATARAN. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
1. NIM. 2113121050 COVER .pdf - Published Version
Download (47kB) | Preview
2. NIM. 2113121050 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version
Download (583kB) | Preview
3. NIM. 2113121050 ABSTRACT .pdf - Published Version
Download (178kB) | Preview
4. NIM. 2113121050 PREFACE .pdf - Published Version
Download (223kB) | Preview
5. NIM. 2113121050 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version
Download (211kB) | Preview
6. NIM. 2113121050 LIST OF TABLES.pdf - Published Version
Download (176kB) | Preview
7. NIM. 2113121050 LIST OF APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version
Download (173kB) | Preview
8. NIM. 2113121050 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version
Download (377kB) | Preview
12. NIM. 2113121050 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version
Download (133kB) | Preview
13. NIM. 2113121050 BIBLIOGRAPHY .pdf - Published Version
Download (228kB) | Preview
Abstract
This study is purposed to describe the errors in grammatical features of report text. In addition, this study is also aimed to describe the possible causes of those errors. This study applied the descriptive qualitative approach of which the data were obtained from the report texts that were written by the eleventh grade students of accounting major in SMK N 1 Jorlang Hataran. The data were collected by using students’ report texts and questionnaires. The data then were analyzed by identifying the errors first, then describing the errors, and the last explaining the errors. The errors that occurred in students’ texts are errors in verbs, sentences, prepositions, articles, agreements, pronouns, modifiers, and tenses. The result of the study indicates that the students made 541 grammatical errors which were classified into: 37,15% errors in verbs, 18,85% errors in noun, 15,15% errors in sentence, 11,27% errors in preposition, 7,76% errors in article, 4,06% errors in pronoun, 3,51% errors in modifier, and 2,21% errors in tenses. The students’ errors were caused by 31,23% ignorance of grammatical rules, 28,09% incomplete application of rules, 15,89% false concept hypothesized, 13,86% interference of interlingual transfer, 9,05% wrong communication strategy, 1,84% over-generalization.
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | SK-2017 ENG 026 |
Keywords: | Errors; Grammatical features; Causes of errors |
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice) L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1705 Education and training of teachers and administrators > LB1775 Professional aspects of teaching and school administrators. Vocational guidance P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P201 Comparative grammar |
Divisions: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris |
Depositing User: | Mrs Siti Nurbaidah |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2017 03:58 |
Last Modified: | 21 Mar 2017 03:58 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/23792 |