Triandini, Retni (2014) THE DIFFERENCE OF ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS TAUGHT BY CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION IN MATHEMATICS GRADE VIII OF SMPN 1 TANJUNG MORAWA ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2013/2014. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.
409312012 COVER.pdf - Published Version
Download (139kB) | Preview
409312012 LEMBAR PENEGSAHAN.pdf - Published Version
Download (117kB) | Preview
409312012 KATA PENGANTAR.pdf - Published Version
Download (242kB) | Preview
409312012 ABSTRAK.pdf - Published Version
Download (197kB) | Preview
409312012 DAFTAR ISI.pdf - Published Version
Download (283kB) | Preview
409312012 DAFTAR TABEL .pdf - Published Version
Download (234kB) | Preview
409312012 DAFTAR GAMBAR.pdf - Published Version
Download (125kB) | Preview
409312012 DAFTAR LAMPIRAN.pdf - Published Version
Download (241kB) | Preview
409312012 BAB I.pdf - Published Version
Download (572kB) | Preview
409312012 BAB V.pdf - Published Version
Download (188kB) | Preview
409312012 DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version
Download (337kB) | Preview
Abstract
The type of this study is a quasy-experiment study. The objective of this research is to know: “The students’ mathematics achievement by using contextual teaching and learning (CTL) is higher than by using direct instruction”. The population of this research is all of students in SMPN 1 Tanjung Morawa with total of 972 students. The sampling technique applied was cluster random sampling. The control class that is chosen VIII-5 consisted of 36 students, meanwhile the experiment class that is chosen VIII-2 consisted of 36 students. The instruments are used to measure the students mathematics achievement was a multiple-choice test and the students learning style was questionnaire. The normality test used of Lilliefor’s test and the homogeneity test by using Fisher test. The data analysis technique was t-test at the level of significance α = 5%.
The study result showed that: “The students mathematic achievement taught by contextual teaching and learning (CTL) is higher than the students mathematics achievement taught by direct instruction, where tcount (1.2349) < ttable (1.9944) and Sig. Contextual (0.015) < 0.05 and Sig. Direct Instruction (0.039) < 0.05”.
The level of learning mastery for student or KKM, If student gets a minimum score is greater than or equal 2.66 (KKM ≥ 2.66), so student obtain completeness of learning. The students score is 67.01% (moderate), cumulative learning is 93.06% (very good items questioner).
Based on the data analysis result of multiple comparisons by t-test, it can be conclude that the student’s mathematics achievements not have different which is taught by contextual teaching and learning (CTL) with students by direct instruction.
Keywords: Contextual, Direct Instruction, Mathematics Achievement
Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 512.920 71 Tri d |
Keywords: | direct instruction; mathematics achievement; contextual; mathematics learning; component of contextual learning; inquiry; constructivism |
Subjects: | L Education > LB Theory and practice of education Q Science > QA Mathematics |
Divisions: | Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Pendidikan Matematika |
Depositing User: | Mrs Desy Sry Yani |
Date Deposited: | 08 Apr 2016 08:34 |
Last Modified: | 23 Aug 2016 09:03 |
URI: | https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/12074 |