POLITENESS PRINCIPLE IN INTERRUPTIONS IN INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB

Lubis, Sofia Idawati (2015) POLITENESS PRINCIPLE IN INTERRUPTIONS IN INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB. Masters thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM. 8136111054 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (54kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM. 8136111054 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (208kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM. 8136111054 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (74kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM. 8136111054 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (76kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM. 8136111054 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version

Download (91kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM. 8136111054 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (48kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM. 8136111054 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (47kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM. 8136111054 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (152kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
12. NIM. 8136111054 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (67kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM. 8136111054 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (122kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study was aimed at examining the politeness principle in interruptions in Indonesia Lawyers Club. The objectives of this study were 1) to find out the types of politeness principle occurred in the talk show, 2) to find out the dominant type of politeness principle occurred, and 3) to find out the reasons of those types of politeness principle occurred the ways they were. This research was conducted by qualitative method. The source of data were Indonesia Lawyers Club. They were chosen randomly. The technique of data collection was documentary technique. The instrument of data collection was observation from the video recordings of four episodes of Indonesia Lawyers Club. They were analyzed by qualitative content analysis. The findings showed that 1) there were five types of politeness principle occurred, namely: tact maxim (obedience 3.13%, violation 51.56%), generosity maxim (obedience 23.44%, violation 0.00%), approbation maxim (obedience 1.04%, violation 2.08%), modesty maxim (obedience 1.04%, violation 0.00%), agreement maxim (obedience 11.98%, violation 5.73%), and sympathy maxim (obedience 0.00%, violation 0.00%). 2) The violation of tact maxim was dominantly occurred in interruptions. 3) The reasons for obeying and violating of politeness principle were to reduce competition between addressee’s purpose and what politeness claimed, to find out affable, to cause offence, to tease others, and to make a joke or humorous interruptions

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorSihombing, Lince196104251986012001
Thesis advisorDirgeyasa, I Wy.196404221992031001
Call Number: 401.9 Lub p
Keywords: Pragmatics; Speech acts; Television talk show; Indonesia lawyers club; Interruptions
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF309 Consciousness. Cognition
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P95 Oral communication. Speech
P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN1990 Broadcasting
Divisions: Program Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Siti Nurbaidah
Date Deposited: 08 May 2016 18:01
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/5105

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item