IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES IN 2016 USA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATE

MATONDANG, IRMA ISTIANE (2018) IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES IN 2016 USA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEBATE. Masters thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM. 8126111011 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (74kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM. 8126111011 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (435kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM. 8126111011 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (65kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM. 8126111011 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (134kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM. 8126111011 TABLE OF CONTENTT.pdf - Published Version

Download (90kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM. 8126111011 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (94kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM. 8126111011 ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version

Download (87kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM. 8126111011 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (90kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
9. NIM. 8126111011 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (454kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM. 8126111011 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (62kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
14. NIM. 8126111011 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (220kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to find out: (1) the types of impoliteness strategy used by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in their first presidential election debate, (2) the realization of impoliteness strategy used by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in their first presidential election debate and (3) the reasons for using impoliteness strategy used by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in their first presidential election debate. This research was in descriptive qualitative design. The subject of this study was the first debate of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. The data from this study was a debate dialogue from transcriptions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the first debate of presidential elections taken from the internet. The data were identified, analyzed, and grouped according to Culpeper theory (1996, 2003), and Beebe (1995). The results of the study found that both candidates performed 4 types of speech impersonation during the debate. Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton applied impoliteness strategies: (1) Bald on Record Impoliteness, (2) Positive Impoliteness, (3) Negative Impoliteness, and (4) Sarcasm or Mock Politeness. In realization, the speech implied by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were categorized as (1) snub, (2) disassociate with others, (3) use dissected, (4) seek disagreement, (5) use taboo words, (6) ) frighten, (7) condescend, (8) explicitly associate other with negative aspects. Furthermore, the reasons for both candidates in using impoliteness strategies in their presidential election debate were (1) to appear superior, (2) to get power over action, (3) to vent negative feelings, (4) to get power whenever there is an imbalance, 5) to entertain others, and there was another reason found in this study that is to self-defense. However, the findings only become temporary data so further research is needed by using other research subjects to gain a better understanding of the impoliteness strategies in another presidential election debates.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorGURNING, BUSMIN195907131986011001
Thesis advisorMURNI, SRI MINDA196305251988032016
Keywords: impoliteness; presidential debate
Subjects: E History America > E11 America (General)
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions: Program Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Yuni Chairani
Date Deposited: 24 Apr 2018 15:55
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/30081

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item