QUESTION CONSTRUCTION IN RELATION TO PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES IN COURTROOM CROSS-EXAMINATION IN MEDAN

Wau, Senadaman (2016) QUESTION CONSTRUCTION IN RELATION TO PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES IN COURTROOM CROSS-EXAMINATION IN MEDAN. Masters thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 Cover.pdf - Published Version

Download (100kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 APPROVAL.pdf - Published Version

Download (923kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (63kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 Acknoledgment.pdf - Published Version

Download (141kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 LIST OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version

Download (182kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 LIST OF FIGURES.pdf - Published Version

Download (160kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 LIST OF APPENDIXES.pdf - Published Version

Download (162kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 LIST OF TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (141kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
9. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (399kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (201kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
14. Senadaman Reg. No. 8146111062 REFERENCES.pdf - Published Version

Download (269kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study aims to identify the types of question construction in relation to pragmatic strategies in courtroom cross-examination in Medan, how the questions constructed, why the questions constructed in the way they are. This research is designed in qualitative research design. The data are the utterances in terms of question, and the source of data is the interaction between barristers and witnesses. The data is analyzed by applying interactive model (Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014). The findings are: there are ten types of question construction in relation to idea-targeted pragmatic strategies, and five types of question construction in relation to person-targeted pragmatic strategies. The question construction in relation to idea-targeted pragmatic strategies was constructed from witness previous testimony it is being held, meanwhile the question construction in relation to person-targeted pragmatic strategies was constructed from witness previous testimony in chief examination. The question construction in relation to idea-targeted pragmatic strategies was constructed in the way they are because of the contradictions, meanwhile the question construction in relation to person-targeted pragmatic strategies was constructed in the way they are because of the doubt on witness characteristics in that cross-examination. The researcher suggests that the result of this research can be used as the guidance for the readers and further researchers who are interested in forensic linguistic.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorGinting, Siti Aisyah195705211984032002
Thesis advisorZein, T. Thyrhaya196301091988032001
Call Number: 401.9 Wau q
Keywords: Question construction; Pragmatic strategies; Cross-examination
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P118 Language acquisition
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P201 Comparative grammar
Divisions: Program Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Siti Nurbaidah
Date Deposited: 18 Oct 2016 01:55
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/20619

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item