PENGARUH PEMBERIAN TUGAS DAN KEMAMPUAN AWAL TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MEKANIKA TEKNIK MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIMED

Sebayang, Nono (2010) PENGARUH PEMBERIAN TUGAS DAN KEMAMPUAN AWAL TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MEKANIKA TEKNIK MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIMED. Masters thesis, UNIMED.

[thumbnail of 081188210012 kata pengantar.pdf]
Preview
Text
081188210012 kata pengantar.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 081188210012 abstrak.pdf]
Preview
Text
081188210012 abstrak.pdf - Published Version

Download (184kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 081188210012 bab I.pdf]
Preview
Text
081188210012 bab I.pdf - Published Version

Download (37kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 081188210012 bab V.pdf]
Preview
Text
081188210012 bab V.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The aim of this research are to know : ( 1 ) the effect of individual task
presenting method and group task presenting method to the student aclrievement of
Engineering Mechanics II ; ( 2 ) the effect of the high student's entry behavior and low
student's entry behavior to the student achievement of Engineering Mechanics II ; ( 3 )
The interuction between task presenting method and student's entry behavior to the
student's achievemant of Engineering Mechanics II.
The population af this research is the students of Engineering Paedagogy who
takes the subject Engineering Mechanics II , and the random sampling are class a with 30
students and class B with 30 students. The method used in the research was quasi
experiment with the design factorial 2 x 2, the data analysis used is two ways ANA VA.
The student's entry behavior measured with Technique Physical test. The test is multiple
choise with 40 questions and the reability is 0,874 using KR-20, there are 34 valid
questions.
The result shown that ; The flrst student achievement of Engineering Mechanics
II. Who taught with individual task presenting method is higher than group task
presenting method, where Fh ( 5,28 ) > Ft ( 4,01 ) with the signiflnance rate a= 0.05;
The scond, the student achievement of Engineering Mechanics II who has high entry
behavior is higher than the student achievement of Engineering Mechanics II who has
low entry behavior where Fh ( 136,02 ) > Ft ( 4,01 ) with the signifmance rate a= 0.05;
The third, there is an instruction between task presenting method and entry behavior to
the student achievemant of Engineering Mechanics II, where Fh ( 13,12 ) > Ft ( 4,01 )
with the signifinance rate a= 0.05.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Additional Information: 378.055 Seb p
Uncontrolled Keywords: Belajar;Universiteis and Colleges;Kemampuan;Teknik;Bangunan;Tugas;
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Program Pasca Sarjana > Teknologi Pendidikan
Depositing User: Mrs Yuni Chairani
Date Deposited: 09 Apr 2016 08:13
Last Modified: 06 Jun 2016 06:38
URI: https://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/2847

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item