CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS USED BY ENGLISH POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM DISCUSSION

Hutabarat, Mey Harnita (2015) CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS USED BY ENGLISH POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM DISCUSSION. Masters thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM 8136112053 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (188kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM 8136112053 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (243kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM 8136112053 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (248kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM 8136112053 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (198kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM 8136112053 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version

Download (188kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM 813611LIST OF TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (184kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM 8136112053 LIST OF APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (125kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM 8136112053 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (172kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
12. NIM 8136112053 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (147kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM 8136112053 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (204kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study deals with conversational maxims used by English Postgraduate students in classroom discussion. The data were collected from English Postgraduate students class A yearly 2013. This study employs qualitative descriptive design with object participants to get understanding through this study. The instruments used in this study are recording and interview. The data of this study were students’ utterances which consist of maxims obedience and violation. The data from interview is used to examine the reason of maxim obedience and violation occurrences. The data were analyzed by using interactive model by Miles and Huberman. The finding shows that there are maxim obedience to maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relevance, and maxim of manner (53,33%) and maxim violation (46,66%) happen in the classroom discussion , nevertheless maxim violation is not considered as fault in a kind of conversation. Maxim obedience are done for the reasons convincing the hearer (7,14%), satisfying the hearer (7,14%), clarifying and strengthening (85,71%), and maxim violation are done for the reasons hide the truth (3,12%), safe face (3,12%), satisfy the hearer (18,75%), cheer the hearer (12,5%), convincing the hearer (43,75%), and clarifying and strengthening (18,75%).

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorSihombing, Lince196104251986012001
Thesis advisorPulungan, Anni Holila197005222001122001
Call Number: 418.830 711 Hut c
Keywords: Conversational implicature; Conversational maxims; Classroom discussion; English postgraduate program
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB3011 School management and discipline
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > P101 Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Program Pasca Sarjana > Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Siti Nurbaidah
Date Deposited: 08 May 2016 17:46
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/5104

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item