implementation
classe
shown
interview
smith
IPA
verbal
conducting
matter
categorie
importance
people
really
show
taxonomy
lack
foster
knowledge
deal
student
wa
learning
research
krathwoll
application
both
curriculum
C5
get
deliberately
mathematic
something
academic
approach
procedural
mental
INTRODUCTION
today
natural
stating
experience
who
expected
indication
silent
causing
action
author
provide
way
understanding
identified
classroom
description
creating
2014
increase
previou
2001
later
understand
communicate
gathering
group
negeri
reach
remembering
classified
department
follow
order
following
data
after
opportunity
interested
C4
develop
conclusion
inindicate
relationship
method
material
regarding
operational
most
information
fact
seen
only
meet
into
documentation
students'
attitude
percentage
value
gradex
science
make
2013
some
non
szymanski
begin
ability
improve
cholifah
creative
know
metacognition
concept
term
verbally
isone
C1
LOTS
questioning
well
questioningabiltybased
form
rizkianingsih
give
different
hasruddin
emergence
trained
number
remember
produce
100
how
their
therefore
having
included
question
required
also
too
accordance
like
biologysubject
fear
especially
ha
include
compulsory
based
made
apply
evaluate
evaluating
participate
everyday
scientific
HOTS
element
entitled
domain
useful
use
achievement
arise
confidence
aim
mutual
scope
reasearch
dominate
C6
gain
above
studied
type
there
asking
directly
amount
krathwohl
C3
applying
researcher
answered
think
result
biology
stated
need
medan
interaction
important
comparison
all
2019
development
factor
including
create
grade
writing
expressing
presenter
thingking
they
studentsask
definition
SMA
alternative
categorization
life
subject
addition
measured
benefit
study
encouragement
observation
about
prove
varied
ramadhan
clas
active
achieved
answer
C2
abilitie
revealed
cognitive
determine
measure
category
presentation
observing
said
lead
whose
thinking
encourage
skill
indicator
conducted
SCL
three
2018
reference
2011
activitie
two
XI
each
attention
identification
one
find
year
considered
objective
still
will
cause
quite
teacher
very
problem
associating
grouping
then
dominated
teaching
quantity
due
collected
analyzing
quality
difficulty
proces
raised
clarify
given
analysi
between
though
opportunitie
les
centered
must
able
using
dimension
formulated
namely
bloom'
himself
decomposition
2017
limited
unable
actively
because
KKM
level
asked
done
frequency
CHAPTER
used
when
background
explore
communicating
revision
specified
found
ask
low
through
school
courage
difficultie
review
five
out
kemendikbud
stage
bloom
looking
completenes
anderson
thing
cannot
not
high
analyze