issue
accurately
contribute
hari
hurd
pedagogic
willi
conducting
giving
importance
people
really
education
reader
item
even
involve
viewed
better
tremendou
final
awarenes
differently
knowledge
170
compelled
vast
reflection
descriptive
student
set
teach
job
learner
representation
referred
passive
learning
research
essay
both
curriculum
prior
would
get
global
planning
dalam
something
approach
age
higher
mental
hope
INTRODUCTION
necessary
repertoire
four
investigated
satuan
absorb
narrative
topic
mastering
interactive
expected
causing
many
way
thirteen
1974
understanding
focused
classroom
description
composition
say
increase
providing
understand
monologue
contextually
introduced
departemen
communicate
bathia
pendidikan
vocabularie
negeri
dan
situated
great
particular
than
without
effective
guiding
indonesian
technology
follow
nasional
order
following
difference
sehari
repeat
someone
kind
sure
telling
whole
new
skilled
vital
experienced
communication
2009
actually
structurally
semester
did
method
any
more
material
report
had
information
procedure
seen
refer
only
meet
good
master
state
registered
senior
least
sastra
value
hortatory
merely
make
choose
some
applied
busy
ability
improve
competency
enterprise
mind
creative
why
product
know
variou
lower
specific
design
concept
significance
correctnes
competence
2008
repeatedly
increasingly
well
concentrated
motivate
tanjungbalai
fungsional
meant
world
realitie
form
give
may
spoof
different
institutionalized
functional
test
how
event
their
therefore
writer
question
comprehending
mastered
also
related
but
like
especially
ha
receptive
compulsory
based
discusse
meaning
unit
field
such
greater
apply
example
discussed
monolog
programme
gilakjani
serie
memahami
scientific
complex
2007
psychology
convincing
reason
achieve
useful
proficiently
use
identifying
until
mean
message
exposition
intuitive
scope
brain
perspective
trying
kehidupan
instruction
help
competition
play
tingkat
pedagogically
determinative
studied
goal
simulated
context
pendek
situation
nature
there
market
certain
contextual
fluency
116
systematically
government
should
applying
taught
researcher
meanwhile
era
word
kebudayaan
result
text
stated
need
interaction
informational
although
important
recipe
all
2006
speaking
linguistic
practically
comprehensively
grammatically
support
don
complete
mapping
content
assisting
similaritie
ministry
grade
clue
relational
gerot
depth
comprehend
educational
argument
forty
didactical
designed
they
adopt
SMA
meaningful
helping
showing
language
lesson
fakulta
advice
tested
subject
every
model
national
knapp
explain
kontek
study
organized
effectively
about
defined
own
english
active
makna
impact
guideline
getting
triangle
transfering
sense
memory
force
letter
lead
feature
approximate
discussion
2005
second
skill
furthermore
work
construct
chemata
reference
2011
activitie
two
grave
XI
role
technique
kementerian
discover
reality
however
consequently
one
find
schemata
fluently
considered
murphy
universita
anecdote
objective
berbentuk
will
dialogue
future
teacher
very
problem
discourse
moral
indeed
vocabulary
kurikulum
then
teaching
often
same
believed
motivation
proces
explanation
tool
sent
given
analysi
convenient
book
passage
female
though
influenced
grammar
thought
2010
malang
public
theoretically
must
able
using
conceptual
since
comprehension
formulated
firstly
literature
written
within
genre
processing
because
communicative
literacy
altogether
level
lem
asked
done
management
CHAPTER
them
used
story
when
background
quickly
EFL
tek
further
ought
thirty
decoding
recount
familiar
translate
analytical
found
reading
secondly
through
while
developed
formal
school
1994
try
spoken
read
conveyed
strategy
purpose
present
facilitating
see
difficultie
review
tag
interpreted
general
phrase
task
discovering
out
KTSP
stage
social
short
chance
announcement
carry
instance
learn
thing
phenomena
binding
not
brown
standard
community
before
high
first