The Implementation of Deception Strategy Used by Fahri Hamzah as an Indonesian People’s Representative Council in the Political Debate

This research was analyzed of deception strategies
by Indonesian Peoples Representative Council. The objective of the study was to find out the implementation of deception strategies were used by Indonesian Peoples Representative Council. This research used a descriptive and qualitative method. The data were classified of utterances in debate of deception strategies by Indonesian Peopless Representative Council. The
technique for collecting the data was documentary technique . The data analysis was concerned of the implementation of deception strategies. Furthermore Indonesian Peoples Representative Council have a different perspectives in ideas,selective in choosing the words, using a hidden meaning, and more indirect to deliver utterances. For the results the violation
of Grice maxims resulting the deception strategies such as :Fabrication (47%), Dissociation (11%), Equivocation (36%),
Ostensible promise (5%). The researcher was applied the
analysis model proposed by deception from resulting in Violation
Grice Maxim. The analysis would be aimed at Fahri Hamzah
statement as a People’s Representative Council debate about Corruption Eradication Commission Issue. The issue have controversial in government. Because the writer believed that is possible that Deception Strategies occurred more in a debate show that has more conflict than the one that has less conflict in the show itself to cover their ideology to make all of the people agree with their ideology. Deception Strategies might be negative
perspective or positive persvective based on their needed to be safe theirselves.