proven
learned
distinguished
taken
classe
goal
instructional
2002
option
21th
nature
there
meier
lawrence
appropriate
180
owned
people
treated
outcome
education
item
siburian
lack
enjoyable
1991
rose
better
tarigan
taught
final
think
memorization
inform
liliefor
proposed
attractive
known
4613
secuensial
person
organize
seminar
perception
emphasi
hanim
result
keyword
student
wa
set
stated
disadvantage
AISTEEL
siti
need
capture
could
learning
medan
interaction
research
hypothese
both
program
overcome
although
biserial
concrete
all
would
speaking
total
development
factor
get
something
encountered
conret
multiple
approach
equally
ofthinking
closely
higherthan
writing
bartlett
higher
'sequential
distributed
educational
ANOVA
valid
significant
nggermanto
INTRODUCTION
right
today
necessary
designed
jakarta
four
thingking
listening
accelerated
guntur
benchmark
who
according
homogeneou
kaifa
arranged
language
emotional
media
expected
indonesia
consisting
questionnaire
expository
distinguish
dick
action
many
tested
subject
moment
tiur
expres
provide
supporting
way
national
addition
addressed
explain
fast
benefit
study
affect
description
gmail
accelarated
case
organized
effectively
faster
defined
prove
creating
DISCUSSION
together
previou
concret
2001
efficiently
empowering
reseach
sampling
clas
understood
active
achieved
random
answer
communicate
earlier
abilitie
group
revealed
accepted
negeri
seriou
than
measure
effective
central
reigeluth
indonesian
secuential
doctoral
effort
methodology
order
280
data
whose
thinking
discussion
strategie
2005
instrumental
second
difference
1997
skill
sanjaya
aliyah
instrument
new
conducted
jersey
whether
quasi
three
bandung
exam
aliyahnegeri
feeling
activitie
aliyahnegeri2
communication
two
betweeen
XI
each
role
eissn
technique
cutting
attention
interactionsbetween
actually
CONCLUSION
efficient
miarso
testing
simpleexpository
compared
characteristic
one
find
method
any
more
material
considered
most
had
information
leadership
sequential
aisyah
measurement
validity
relevant
objective
will
procedure
average
experiment
fact
thesample
quite
sample
cause
teacher
very
correlation
problem
component
carey
monotone
III
into
advanced
indeed
then
state
nationally
teaching
suit
associated
students'
involving
formula
argued
quality
lecture
often
hi
differentiate
finding
indicate
proces
transformative
influencing
some
REFERENCES
accekerated
analysi
society
improve
between
aspect
book
creatively
determining
put
deliver
acceptable
erlbaum
madrasah
com
trial
oriented
IV
140
mind
henry
fully
product
CBC
know
variou
accord
dave
reflected
must
design
able
darwin
style
using
single
stakeholder
MAN
advantage
other
factorial
normally
namely
university
verbally
view
2008
unable
obtained
concluded
opinion
culture
proceeding
2004
nicholl
choice
processing
well
2x2
condition
literacy
variance
themselve
done
suitable
idea
management
experimental
cluster
II
form
them
used
annual
when
different
thu
outcomesit
further
METHOD
influence
called
remember
consisted
population
test
how
their
therefore
interpretation
question
point
couldbecombining
hand
strategic
carried
also
related
but
too
analytical
found
improving
reading
ha
training
low
through
while
succes
based
dediahimsa
fisher'
such
strategy
edge
strategiesbased
2548
heavy
intellectual
convenience
human
participate
century
kencana
task
showed
international
concretesequential
out
achieve
wouldshowed
imaginative
acclerated
wina
nichoo
social
use
looking
achievement
theorie
learn
rigidity
require
requirement
asih
sitiaisyahhanim123
mean
not
brain
nuansacendikia
effect
3rd
abstract
instruction
high
hypothesi
above
help
first
overall
analyze
2003