proven
learned
taken
classe
scheffe
participant
panjaitan
fcount
seeing
urban
goal
type
context
mohammad
there
everyone
S1
djuanda
specialize
people
outcome
education
reader
systematically
show
rejected
sukriyah
1975
VAK
mention
minister
better
taught
researcher
final
think
knowledge
build
liliefor
werw
modalitie
word
4613
assumption
sumatra
universitaspendidikan
table
seminar
underlie
fiction
line
fisher
result
keyword
207
descriptive
student
text
CLT
wa
real
teach
stated
AISTEEL
deviation
need
kecerdasan
outside
performed
everything
learning
medan
interaction
2626
research
both
appreciate
program
important
all
mainly
2006
speaking
linguistic
significantly
total
support
readig
181
oflinguistic
get
control
itself
third
content
andpersonality
grammatical
something
below
academic
multiple
approach
speak
grade
nur
enter
rather
district
zimbabwe
writing
bartlett
higher
mental
educational
homogeneity
ANOVA
valid
significant
height
INTRODUCTION
right
easily
studi
comunikatif
they
listening
introduce
definition
SMA
embrace
socialize
narrative
who
according
differentiation
vol
language
analyzed
sharing
indonesia
main
calculation
padangsidempuan
discussing
tsting
111
action
median
many
conventional
normality
life
tested
subject
odd
expres
intrinsic
system
author
saussure'
planned
sumedang
provide
competene
way
national
178
accommodate
understanding
focusing
measured
structuralist
study
yahoo
affect
description
wiwitan
case
observation
conveying
about
scondary
2014
together
previou
suggested
published
literary
reliableresearch
english
online
understand
tesil
clas
introduced
linguisticcompetence
examine
achieved
answer
communicate
saussure
rugara
abilitie
collection
group
visualized
revealed
2141
accepted
negeri
u𝐵1
theory
damage
reliable
long
determine
without
than
measure
initial
indonesian
history
technology
continued
said
ininfluencing
consited
syntax
data
emphasize
abdul
after
discussion
academicjournal
VI
second
difference
skill
AB
tuckey
work
instrument
RJK
tho
SD
galat
conducted
org
intelligence
ganesha
whether
SMK
quasi
bandung
2018
needed
develop
feeling
communication
luhfarmita
two
each
gugu
eissn
technique
u𝐵2
narative
CONCLUSION
ofmedan
describe
leaning
reality
fifth
close
RESULTS
limit
available
wellek
reject
semester
communcative
one
relationship
find
method
incorporated
autonomou
more
year
material
komu
regarding
among
padangsidimpuan
DOI
s_ria50
biography
information
leadership
january
N0O
private
andwarren
validity
IJEL
rule
will
investigating
average
experiment
A1
seen
PRESS
sample
teacher
aesthetic
problem
structural
tinggi
became
popular
masvingo
approache
III
chomsky
into
inferential
journal
lecturing
then
state
conclude
teaching
associated
direct
students'
senior
elementary
attitude
B1
six
maximize
μA1
often
hi
acommunicative
difficulty
value
finding
described
intended
same
science
make
proces
transformative
6990
influencing
tool
2013
DIGILIB
function
REFERENCES
improvement
peri
noam
internasional
analysi
250
58970IJEL11
4517
ability
improve
between
aspect
book
competency
parallel
positive
devided
grammar
com
thought
IV
2222
www
public
pattern
essentially
children
consider
must
design
able
using
testusing
concept
other
factorial
significance
term
vol2
namely
university
narrativerelationship
literature
competence
graphically
view
rugara'
2017
ftable
within
totaling
concluded
culture
write
obtain
proceeding
gianyar
choice
2x2
well
recent
because
communicative
variance
level
asked
lexical
themselve
done
capability
idea
jurnalmimbr
H0
experimental
II
realitie
206
form
anggitkhairani
regardles
used
annual
true
being
when
background
http
may
PGSD
reveal
thu
approachi
mode
examination
further
change
METHOD
number
summary
influence
remember
μA2
population
test
A2
luh
batubara
ISSN
how
their
therefore
included
linguistik
question
performance
carried
required
also
2012
015
but
group35
found
generative
chomsky'
accordance
reading
assume
statistical
low
factorialanava
through
while
reliability
take
thesi
based
meaning
school
literarywork
finally
wiwitan'
645
read
greater
scial
purpose
equivalent
regularly
B2
2548
fun
see
north
jabeen
time
208
difficultie
human
personality
everyday
hypotesi
interpreted
104
anava
general
competencie
cell
international
gianyur
communictiveapproach
out
element
103
201
achieve
stage
consist
sibuea
busines
sentence
social
use
unlike
2268
UPI
achievement
educator
comunicative
aim
postgraduate
manifest
requirement
JK
muin
mean
not
listen
effect
keysar
appoach
standard
3rd
before
gain
abstract
ESL
place
high
hypothesi
one'
first
analyze
structure
2003