issue
classe
satisfying
verbal
A1B1
owned
knowledge
student'
liliefor
square
9401
617X
learner
hypothese
both
184
adapt
bartlett
slamet
investigated
experience
topic
vol
provide
competential
SMAN
understanding
gmail
joyce
widely
online
understand
rusman
lacked
negeri
sawiji
without
effectivenes
order
strategie
ari
interested
intelligence
bandung
develop
2009
compared
any
part
confident
only
students'
B1
μA1
value
science
make
RESEARCH
aspect
385
design
etherington
occurred
factorial
wanted
opinion
meant
form
figure
annual
ongoing
optimized
population
ISSN
how
question
also
accordance
2548
time
complex
useful
ecu
effect
ICEBESS
koherency
raja
reinforced
primary
place
learned
context
situation
instructor
asking
professional
familiarized
budiyono
meanwhile
happri
1383
word
187
ARTIKEL_FUJI
per
performed
medan
center
indicated
julaga
itself
create
below
fathurrohman
grade
nadiah
basi
dhewantoro
seel
whatever
lesson
basic
summarize
national
sri
TSOL
silver
own
large
treatment
thinking
furthermore
guidance
ajte
eissn
educate
sum
nengah
find
decision
year
considered
paradigm
DESIGN
III
independent
quality
explanation
given
encouraged
article
book
put
thought
supardan
must
formulated
led
enhanced
select
processing
cluster
delivery
story
novriza
low
through
while
developed
rosdakarya
finally
849
quoted
266
enough
weil
educator
PT
existing
matthew
VIII
analyze
rigid
shown
interesting
2088
matter
source
failed
local
viewed
better
constructivist
etc
4613
descriptive
real
siti
deviation
learning
formulate
bring
curriculum
stimulated
would
approach
self
antologi
today
directing
entire
who
participation
calculation
enni
way
wrong
presented
alone
DISCUSSION
corresponded
2014
programa
possible
contextually
siregar
our
malihah
technology
enthusiastic
opportunity
difference
new
entirely
183
communication
variable
describe
DOI
had
grafindo
asia
motivated
empower
vol36
OF
wahab
intended
REFERENCES
oriented
involved
other
relevention
verbally
well
hmelo
world
LITERATURE
juriahs66
pujiasti
thu
lion
METHOD
hard
μA2
best
235
mastered
2012
too
assume
especially
compulsory
remaja
based
degree
computer
evaluate
everyday
scientific
international
attraction
contributed
junior
mentioned
lot
pointed
responsibility
mutual
trying
nonexistent
goal
selected
known
aimed
solution
stated
working
program
although
solely
during
educational
they
defining
main
median
conventional
normality
expres
system
muhammad
effectively
equate
improved
TABLE
impact
achieved
random
run
separated
second
two
each
technique
attention
discover
testing
average
sample
016
wulandari
argued
upi
proces
hour
syllabu
A2B2
comprenshipagar
2222
public
able
using
critical
μB1
freedom
concluded
level
change
A2
gained
found
clear
sociology
forum
purpose
B2
iss9
rudy
interacted
innovative
solving
social
requirement
selection
standard
community
403
high
implementation
appropriate
outcome
education
possibilitie
even
richey
pedagogy
keyword
wa
third
persada
REVIEW
something
belong
higher
alfabeta
plan
right
dordrecht
2015
sharpen
focused
concerning
description
investigate
sampling
tsoi
dan
follow
concentration
practice
RJK
teacher'
205X
collaboratively
characteristic
relationship
method
more
focu
sosialstudie
relevant
experiment
seen
good
dependent
systematic
state
attitude
2528
file
almost
yogyakarta
toward
finding
transformative
2013
professionalism
film
improvement
respect
certainly
improve
variation
lower
concept
term
widest
186
concentrated
abandoned
give
ANAVA
http
different
number
test
produce
event
therefore
related
statistical
include
example
springer
evaluating
tan
week
sapriya
cindy
achievement
march
suati
randomized
help
thinker
supported
TEST
there
directly
should
discus
seek
taught
researcher
diakse
city
fisher
result
AISTEEL
interaction
baharuddin
comparison
all
linguistic
total
development
encountered
critically
significant
easily
SMA
alternative
life
explain
study
daring
monitoring
urgency
independently
said
investigative
galat
suwandi
available
communicated
manggi
objective
still
A1
teacher
damri
became
inferential
then
teaching
improvisation
analyzing
GI
komariah
analysi
solve
les
2010
fasifik
cooperative
s11245
useles
topoi
obtained
situmorang
because
variance
blamed
done
idea
H0
experimental
techno
used
true
responsible
background
debate
mode
influence
small
training
criti
review
elly
appreciation
μB2
team
identify
treated
doc
building
table
student
could
logical
research
application
doing
planning
haunted
A2B1
rather
sosiate
volume
key
INTRODUCTION
jakarta
mastery
expected
many
gunawan
planned
tutorial
1972
classroom
tended
previou
suggested
efficiently
preferred
group
implement
than
standart
data
adapting
allocated
AB
evaluation
quasi
needed
PBL
FINDING
undiksha
material
information
leadership
into
making
sjarkawi
received
centralized
applied
ability
necessarily
com
studie
innovation
significance
university
chemistry
SUMMARY
2nd
A1B2
proved
their
interpretation
required
but
is
agreement
got
unlikely
evidence
critic
empowered
made
fun
afraid
showed
psychology
use
theme
1735
SMP
mean
edu
abstract
hypothesi
above
185
oktober
ruzz
studied
contextual
applying
think
seminar
heterogeneou
line
intelectual
homogeneity
1007
IPS
RESULT
organizing
according
media
mail
subject
model
addition
case
prove
clas
active
cognitive
provided
presentation
chose
might
answering
started
skill
work
conducted
2011
activitie
one
pongtuluran
very
problem
journal
vision
purwadi
between
fail
though
influenced
centered
pattern
juriah
appeared
ngoh
actively
proceeding
2004
capabilitie
2x2
II
them
cultivating
further
summary
succes
australian
take
school
read
strategy
acros
sety
commitment
bookish
out
core
busines
short
2016
learn
investigation
require
philosophy
JK
haveaim
not
before
first