issue
classe
show
final
student'
square
set
teach
both
object
mathematic
vol
routine
883
gmail
2001
understand
negeri
department
effectivenes
strategie
back
interested
SMK
bandung
experienced
2009
criteria
H1
RESULTS
learningmodel
fact
only
students'
value
science
make
MKPMB
aspect
design
328
increasingly
form
figure
annual
may
population
ISSN
having
question
also
undertaken
ha
reliability
unit
2548
assessed
MT
complex
836
coopertive
primary
winda
practical
nature
designing
index
word
medan
toftable
itself
below
ministry
grade
attribute
suggest
lesson
national
affect
facing
focal
defined
reasoning
treatment
measure
abdul
statistic
directorate
arikunto
XI
eissn
CONCLUSION
find
site
year
among
soucrce
eighth
amounting
investigatiom
III
magetan
744
independent
quality
difficulty
tool
given
connect
239
2017
ftable
management
base
point
through
while
abdulhalimiain
difficultie
enough
822
edition
analyze
contribute
matter
source
dtable
better
4613
learning
get
approach
self
district
valid
area
who
participation
calculation
TPS
analysistwo
139
DISCUSSION
2014
001then
whithin
following
after
difference
start
variable
semester
acquired
938
sugiyono
look
collaborative
236
cooperation
contain
intended
function
REFERENCES
practicing
tim
influential
other
varian
061
implementing
derived
included
collect
especially
based
field
member
syarifah
rineka
accustomed
scientific
international
junior
essential
communicat
edy
activity
goal
type
rejected
001
known
synthesise
solution
stated
NCTM
content
during
revised
educational
ANOVA
homogeneou
normality
system
razak
contemporary
grasindo
variabel
random
abilitie
determine
took
andlearning
several
emphasize
discussion
2018
two
each
wherea
posttest
differen
average
sample
grouping
reserved
connected
elementary
described
troubleshooting
865
checking
able
using
concluded
surya
level
faculty
complicated
390
reaserch
karanganyar
window
purpose
innovative
task
774
solving
social
selection
standard
pair
high
structure
implementation
fcount
share
appropriate
outcome
education
involve
already
756
bility
keyword
wa
met
021
alfabeta
plan
sheet
four
2015
105
act
toword
learningstrategy
description
901
refused
sampling
determined
accepted
follow
RJK
eight
relationship
more
measurement
validity
procedure
experiment
seen
good
dependent
state
yogyakarta
toward
transformative
secondary
processe
improve
variou
term
capability
give
confirmation
lie
different
237
test
related
include
device
entitled
achievement
F0
help
email
there
CONCLUSIONS
yogakarta
should
discus
taught
researcher
result
AISTEEL
interaction
reform
power
all
total
factor
structured
significant
post
prastiana
life
study
implemented
about
together
normal
O2
category
council
X2
METHODS
objective
teacher
2339
then
teaching
4871
daily
similar
motivation
GI
assesment
analysi
solve
space
peer
les
2010
240
cooperative
544
obtained
because
variance
idea
H0
experimental
uncompleted
used
background
influence
pas
toin
inmathematical
fadillah
poste
intellectual
JICA
chance
sugiono
team
electronic
giving
experimentation
people
trianto
sufficient
table
student
research
application
essay
063
planning
academic
VA
INTRODUCTION
3409
jakarta
expected
many
mathemathical
classroom
score
D0
facilitator
group
than
just
2000
data
820
instrument
hone
quasi
respectively
needed
1685
conclusion
fvalue
reject
material
'motivation
information
leadership
X1
progressive
non
against
ftabel
ability
com
IV
spss16
investigator
university
principle
2008
032
118
194
2nd
MBS
distribution
but
evidence
logically
greater
such
grain
620
classical
kencana
showed
reason
math
use
SMP
RPP
mean
medium
halim
abstract
above
meeting
aunurrahman
applying
think
seminar
line
validated
depth
judging
homogeneity
validation
according
indonesia
subject
model
876
observation
clas
active
become
corresponding
skill
work
conducted
2011
mathematical
238
one
very
problem
journal
conjecture
clarify
between
trial
path
since
LAS
namely
algebra
proceeding
2004
capabilitie
train
II
explore
relia
summary
reston
step
validator
school
langkat
general
2016
abilitiy
investigation
JK
not
first