concerned
form
taken
meja
give
takenaksuarakau
life
CHAPTER
subject
justnow
them
used
participant
happen
morecompared
expres
utterane
objective
still
being
she
will
investigating
much
pragmatic
when
insight
studied
background
willlead
man
provide
average
mill
network
way
model
categorized
cashier
seen
teacher
holistically
mutually
only
setting
different
type
woy
interesting
project
understanding
problem
condescend
share
context
identified
bah
situation
produced
pulangkan
supported
there
verbal
focused
fast
discourse
thu
debate
udah
ignore
nicer
further
montgomery
producing
presented
study
gibson
regard
affect
people
mengapo
family
number
scorn
case
memang
good
really
occur
mouth
impolite
education
observation
areles
thefinding
utilized
population
thereason
produce
state
about
lecturer
show
how
event
prove
tehran
inappropriate
their
relation
suaro
direct
1975
therefore
2014
aloud
unknown
should
investigate
bald
teenager
question
assumed
berutak
animal
seek
previou
least
better
own
also
claiming
argued
diam
2001
related
researcher
literary
monkey
but
frequent
researcher'
later
dimensional
found
men
irian
thestudy
culpeper
culpaper
anger
saying
accordance
usefully
food
tuah
identity
dialect
hi
assume
proposed
like
addressee
past
toward
bising
finding
theresult
especially
ha
examine
indicate
same
modality
assumption
deal
conversation
hilang
attacking
make
sarcasm
through
realized
while
hesitation
usefull
table
clear
sociology
choose
based
dimana
conflict
gunokan
educated
some
applied
impolitenes
result
enrich
comedian
face
student
school
wa
deployed
couple
expressed
counting
made
negeri
judgement
cashiersat
dominantly
studentsat
laughter
dislike
field
koro
analysi
asmen
theory
such
gathered
polite
damage
and82one
strategy
interaction
research
focus
considering
example
between
aspect
than
kau
phenomenon
HP
effective
both
put
program
didn
sociolinguistic
power
category
history
although
member
male
shut
claim
important
offensive
female
175
positive
areference
comparison
withold
time
attack
necessarily
all
powerles
disciplinary
woman
M1
analysing
punyo
les
lead
human
feminist
twice
feature
record
tag
practically
following
tarok
pupose
data
todeal
rudenes
umbiguou
women
scientific
object
complex
factor
controlled
panelist
including
strategie
theorist
five
don
heart
phone
rugged
showed
why
started
respond
2005
know
snub
represent
theoretically
propose
psychology
interested
dominant
maleand
mostly
lawakklub
out
cooperative
second
reason
yang
difference
utterance
babee
negative
simanjuntak
must
entitled
responsive
someone
dongarkan
bad
kind
diffrent
studie
something
ideally
harmony
using
indicator
busines
betweenincompatible
grade
tau
useful
whole
new
concept
conducted
formulated
utak
social
occurred
andmanaged
minjam
other
KFC
F1
significance
mock
rtailer
use
call
2011
namely
ratedboth
lakoff
mix
communication
want
speeche
another
two
maker
lost
request
theorie
each
tak
2008
name
doesn
your
significant
role
area
technique
questioning
SMP
husband
investigation
manner
2009
itu
voice
INTRODUCTION
occurrence
singing
165
actually
proportional
sukak
handphone
opposite
establish
usah
connection
they
2004
oyyamak
politenes
mana
introduce
insult
percuma
response
established
sex
mean
well
because
around
phenomena
provoke
enak
abah
not
individual
tadi
listen
who
deference
tentative
brown
compared
ati
scope
brain
according
level
one
wive
remain
friend
did
relationship
find
returned
karang
morpheme
tanjungbalai
ridicule
dismis
2015
her
gender
theirspouse
bousfield
language
effect
any
themselve
borrowed
more
nevade
analyzed
done
recording
speech
ambigou
directed
iran
media
suitable
expected
indonesia
itulah
among
considered
1998
mulutmulutkukoro
comedy
asahan
adition
most
above
early
help
contradict
incompatible
researche
information
analyze
action
multi
focu
noise