THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENT'S MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TYPE AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING

Sirait, Sarah Violita (2017) THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENT'S MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TYPE AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img] Text
1. NIM. 4133311020 COVER_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (62kB)
[img] Text
2. NIM 4133311020 APPROVAL SHEET AND BIOGRAPHY_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (615kB)
[img] Text
3. NIM. 4133311020 ABSTRACT_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (8kB)
[img] Text
4. NIM. 4133311020 PREFACE_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (10kB)
[img] Text
5. NIM. 4133311020 TABLE OF CONTENT_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (9kB)
[img] Text
6. NIM. 4133311020 TABLE_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (5kB)
[img] Text
7. NIM. 4133311020 ILUSTRATION_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (4kB)
[img] Text
8. NIM. 4133311020 APPENDICES_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (5kB)
[img] Text
9. NIM 4133311020 CHAPTER I_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)
[img] Text
13. NIM 4133311020 CHAPTER V_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (12kB)
[img] Text
14. NIM 4133311020 BIBLIOGRAPHY_docx.pdf - Published Version

Download (22kB)

Abstract

The research is aimed to find out there was a difference of student’s mathematical communication ability in cooperative learning Think – Pair – Share (TPS) type with Problem Based Learning. The type of this research was quasi experiment. The population of this research was all students at SMP Budi Murni 2 Medan. The sample was two classes which each consist of 37 students, VIII A as experimental class I which taught by cooperative learning model type TPS and VIII B as experimental class II which taught by Problem Based Learning. The sample was taken by random sampling. Collecting data technique of this research was mathematical communication ability test that was given in the end of learning either in experimental class I or experimental class II. The type of this test was essay test. Technique of analyzing data is consisted of normality, homogeneity, and hypothesis test. Based on normality and homogeneity test, the data was taken from normal distribution and homogeneous variance. From the data analysis of each of experimental class were obtained that the average of posttest score in PBL classroom is higher than in TPS classroom. From the data analysis of posttest score by using t-test with significance level α = 0.05, then it was obtained that tcalculated= 3,96 and ttable = 1,666. Consequently tcalculated> ttable, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. So, it can be concluded that there is difference of student’s mathematical communication ability who taught by cooperative learning TPS type with PBL. Based on research that has been done, mathematics teachers are suggested to use cooperative learning model type TPS or PBL as learning model alternative in improving student’s mathematical communication ability.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorAsmin, 195708041985031002
Call Number: SK-2017 MAT 153
Keywords: mathematical communication ability;TPS;PBL
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA101 Elementary mathematics. Arithmetic
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA71 Instruments and machines
Divisions: Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Pendidikan Matematika
Depositing User: Mr Maknun
Date Deposited: 17 Nov 2017 15:26
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/27217

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item