participant
interview
type
interesting
indirect
there
116
show
even
should
acceptance
interest
researcher
inform
unclear
wa
performed
research
interviewee
both
all
mainly
total
want
they
117
who
language
act
pragmatic
way
representative
explain
case
about
say
formed
suggested
expressive
law
understand
answer
enrich
witnes
theory
follow
consent
order
data
after
investigative
SUGGESTION
second
utterance
develop
reference
specifically
two
conclusion
each
actually
CONCLUSION
describe
session
one
did
find
speech
among
most
declarative
stop
directive
still
interviewer
fact
discourse
direct
analyzing
literal
make
suspect
consider
performing
other
namely
detective
researche
CHAPTER
used
permission
further
lecturer
commissive
their
question
hand
related
but
found
ask
especially
through
while
field
draw
five
dominant
michael
suggestion
not
brown
perform
first
analyze