CLASSROOM INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH CLASS IN SMPN 2 BABALAN

Krisman, Sipahutar (2017) CLASSROOM INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH CLASS IN SMPN 2 BABALAN. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM 2123121026 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (47kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM 2123121026 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (560kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM 2123121026 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (180kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM 2123121026 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (221kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM 2123121026 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version

Download (144kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM 2123121026 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (112kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM 2123121026 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (111kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM 2123121026 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (353kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
12. NIM 2123121026 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (236kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM 2123121026 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (269kB) | Preview

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the types of interaction, the percentage of teacher talk and student talk and the dominant characteristic of interaction which appeared during teaching-learning process in SMP N 2 Babalan in 2016/2017 academic year. This study used descriptive design. The subjects of this study were three classes. One class of the eighth grade and two classes of the nineth grade. The data were analyzed by using Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS). The instruments of collecting data were audio and video recording. The analysis showed that all of the ten types of interaction appeared. The percentages of each type of interaction were: (a) accepting feeling: 0.41%; (b) praising and encouraging: 9.97%; (c) accepting students’ ideas: 0.22%; (d) asking question: 26.26%; (e) lecturing: 4.70%; (f) giving direction: 13.25%; (g) criticizing: 2.21%; (h) tudents talk response: 39.35%; (i) student talk initiation: 1.10%; (j) silence and confusion: 1.93%. Teacher talk percentages were 60.98% in class 8-1, 51.62% in class 9-2 and 61.15% in class 9-5. And the student talk percentages were 37.31% in class 8-1, 47.29% in class 9-2 and 20.09% in class 9-5. The dominant characteristic of interaction was content cross, which means that the teacher focused on giving questions and giving materials. From the results, the researcher concluded that the teacher was dominant in the classroom during the teaching-learning processes.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorWillem, Saragih195812311986011011
Thesis advisorIndra, Hartoyo197410302006041006
Call Number: SK-2017 ENG 080
Keywords: Classroom Interaction, Flander Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS). Teacher Talk, Students Talk
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools
P Language and Literature > PE English > PE1700 Dialects. Provincialisms, etc.
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mr Maknun
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2017 09:57
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/25556

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item