issue
taken
interview
giving
matter
identify
dewi
outcome
education
succed
show
lack
even
immediately
involve
awarenes
studnet
knowledge
choosing
student
wa
real
disadvantage
learner
learning
research
application
existence
doing
planning
mathematic
academic
expand
enter
higher
plan
area
sheet
INTRODUCTION
right
natural
mastery
artikel
experience
individual
who
previously
affirm
routine
many
god
calculu
planned
college
provide
wellman
wrong
understanding
identified
presented
mahasiswa
entitle
2001
derivative
collective
understand
gave
17th
undergraduate
GPA
pendidikan
group
dan
metacognitive
theory
implement
piece
effort
order
figure1
interested
difference
integration
instrument
grown
hone
new
evaluation
develop
wide
SNMPTN
generally
describe
semester
relationship
did
material
operational
procedure
confident
fact
seen
only
correlation
alway
confused
strong
meet
good
making
systematic
pemerintah
state
least
percentage
finding
overview
science
make
choose
countiho
some
processe
matacognition
practicing
begin
ability
creative
why
know
metacognition
course
design
internal
university
another
transform
write
confuse
fill
well
predictor
world
form
peraturan
figure
test
lecturer
how
their
dunning
question
admit
also
related
skillof
but
over
like
include
ha
realized
compulsory
caused
based
critic
depend
field
example
16th
time
evaluate
evaluating
2007
reason
element
suherman
use
identifying
achievement
F3
UMBPTN
misunderstood
lot
mean
scope
nuryanah
major
above
help
reduce
situation
there
S1
unpopular
faced
should
researcher
think
known
word
person
pengelolaan
result
medan
knowing
inhibit
difficult
program
important
all
admission
development
limitation
factor
control
including
february
during
writing
capital
they
definition
dasar
according
subject
national
benefit
beside
study
observation
mistake
about
own
monitoring
trigonometry
active
formulation
alvanda
answer
cognitive
attempt
built
chemical
SBMPTN
monitor
initial
entering
several
aware
thinking
second
skill
furthermore
work
cros
indicator
conducted
guidance
reference
activitie
mathematical
two
each
rahmawati
role
identification
reality
finished
stduent
nurgayah
valuable
one
find
year
considered
still
objective
will
very
problem
avoid
component
demand
journal
then
formula
guided
daily
difficulty
indicate
proces
allow
cognition
here
analysi
solve
MIPA
thought
2010
doe
must
able
using
advantage
formulated
firstly
kiki
2017
integral
because
level
asked
faculty
done
management
II
CHAPTER
used
when
responsible
background
metacogniton
conduct
change
developing
called
step
unknown
performance
found
exposed
woodfolk
ask
secondly
low
dkk
through
succes
held
take
strategy
statement
exhibit
common
difficultie
innovative
correct
stage
solving
completely
learn
existing
broaden
ilmiah
not
penyelenggaraan
high
first