learned
wall
direction
misunderstanding
will
cause
teacher
biologyaccording
very
misconceptionin
problem
2002
context
nature
there
invited
identify
source
outcome
occur
education
varying
sensed
allowing
then
tekkaya
absorption
lack
teaching
tuysuz
discus
conception
come
taught
researcher
CRI
textbook
resulting
knowledge
index
often
hi
daily
difficulty
finding
described
personal
make
proces
vita
explanation
input
lowlearning
some
result
function
thescopeof
biology
text
student
wa
teach
stated
incompatibilitie
non
need
learner
belief
learning
medan
research
retention
between
application
book
difficult
distinguishing
both
overcome
fail
important
opportunitie
2006
publication
object
doe
factor
including
consistency
product
translating
missunderstanding
children
chandrasegaran
variou
transport
must
scientist
conceptual
observe
multiple
grade
concept
formulated
rather
other
significance
piaget
university
environment
want
misconception
ifit
limited
becoming
establishment
INTRODUCTION
within
construction
natural
easily
connection
they
2004
definition
choice
SMA
processing
adverse
response
increasingly
because
affected
experience
who
topic
according
experiencing
plasma
winahyu
simple
resistant
2015
faculty
ideasarea
continuously
salirawati
indication
idea
world
form
give
life
unique
raksana
CHAPTER
subject
them
optimal
sometime
used
true
when
background
way
wrong
stand
may
different
understanding
explain
conduct
organelle
integrating
reconstruct
transferring
further
study
change
affect
summarized
case
surely
optimized
resource
test
about
how
event
inappropriate
their
relation
therefore
2014
question
animal
mahardika
changing
suggested
own
also
2012
related
obtaining
but
membrane
over
found
diverse
induce
biological
impact
especially
include
ha
plant
low
answer
easy
through
modification
facilitator
caused
held
take
our
based
group
school
cognitive
treagust
provided
subconcept
purpose
example
determine
than
just
become
initial
department
consideration
suparno
technology
follow
effort
difficultie
detect
lead
order
interfere
correct
everyday
mechanism
scientific
resorce
complex
thinking
cell
five
deshmukh
2005
2007
dominant
overlooked
second
interviewe
reason
difference
reported
instrument
naturally
useful
adisendjaja
new
conducted
enough
acting
consequence
library
needed
develop
reference
experienced
achievement
XI
each
arise
learn
2009
certainty
it
aim
occurrence
resulted
contribution
generally
identification
describe
lot
testing
around
phenomena
not
integrate
citrawathi
scope
transmitter
method
effect
any
more
material
trying
gain
among
place
instruction
high
gaining
above
help
had
first
information
structure
focu