THE TAXONOMY OF THINKING IN READING QUESTIONS IN “LOOK AHEAD AN ENGLISH COURSE FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 1, 2, & 3

Panjaitan, Beny Septian (2017) THE TAXONOMY OF THINKING IN READING QUESTIONS IN “LOOK AHEAD AN ENGLISH COURSE FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 1, 2, & 3. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM. 2123321009 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (176kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM. 2123321009 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (271kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM. 2123321009 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (96kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM. 2123321009 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (205kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM. 2123321009 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version

Download (125kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM. 2123321009 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (94kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM. 2123321009 ILLUSTRATION.pdf - Published Version

Download (86kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM. 2123321009 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (32kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
9. NIM. 2123321009 CHJAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (314kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM. 2123321009 CHJAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (125kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
14. NIM. 2123321009 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (146kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study aimed at analyzing the cognitive dimension based on Revised Bloom Taxonomy in reading questions in Look Ahead an English Course for Senior High School Level 1, 2, & 3. This study used quantitative research design. The samples were 141 reading questions which taken by using random sampling technique by using Statistical Program for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0. in Look Ahead an English Course for Senior High School Level 1, 2, & 3. The data were analyzed by using Table analysis of cognitive dimension of Revised Bloom Taxonomy. The analysis showed that the most dominant cognitive dimension of Revised Bloom Taxonomy in remembering (57.45%). The second dominant cognitive dimension is understanding (26.24%). The third dominant cognitive dimension is evaluating (10.64%). The fourth dominant cognitive dimension is creating (3.55%). The fifth dominant cognitive dimension is analyzing (2.13%). There was no cognitive dimension of applying that applied in reading question of the textbooks

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorHusein, Rahmat196206291988031002
Thesis advisorGurning, Busmin195907131986011001
Call Number: 2017ENG005
Keywords: cognitive dimension; reading questions; revised bloom taxonomy
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice) > LB1049 Reading (General)
L Education > LC Special aspects of education
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mrs Catur Dedek Khadijah
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2017 10:04
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/23225

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item