DEVELOPING READING COMPREHENSION WORKBOOK FOR GRADE X HIGH SCHOOL

Damayanti,, Annisa (2016) DEVELOPING READING COMPREHENSION WORKBOOK FOR GRADE X HIGH SCHOOL. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM. 2123121003 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (125kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM. 2123121003 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (820kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM. 2123121003 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (334kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM. 2123121003 PREFACE.pdf - Published Version

Download (326kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM 2123121003 TABLE OF CONTENT.pdf - Published Version

Download (169kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM. 2123121003 LIST OF TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (285kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM. 2123121003 LIST OF FIGURES.pdf - Published Version

Download (111kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM. 2123121003 LIST OF APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (177kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
9. NIM. 2123121003 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (324kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM. 2123121003 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (341kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
14. NIM. 2123121003 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (246kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objective of this study was to supplement the reading comprehension questions by analysing the weakness regarding the levels and types of questions in the textbook Contextual English for Grade X of Senior High Schools and to develop a reading comprehension workbook for grade X based on Curriculum 2013 and Barrett’s Taxonomy. It was found that this textbook contained too much literal question which was at 61.6% and only low number of high level questions (10.86%). From the preliminary finding, this workbook was then developed with 210 questions and validated by teacher, lecturer, and also the students’ try out. The result of validation showed that the product was excellent. The average score for each aspect by the first validator was 87.36% (good) and then revise until the score given by the second validator was 91.57% (excellent). The result of students’ try out showed that the value of

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorHusein, Rahmad196206291988031002
Call Number: SK-2016 ENG 171
Keywords: Reading; Questions; Barrett’s taxonomy;Workbook;Validation
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1025 Teaching (Principles and Practice) > LB1049 Reading (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mr Maknun
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2016 02:44
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/21046

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item