GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ON STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION WRITING

Simanjuntak, Afriando Terma (2016) GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ON STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION WRITING. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
1. NIM 2113121003 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (140kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
2. NIM 2113121003 APPROVAL SHEET.pdf - Published Version

Download (636kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
3. NIM 2113121003 ABSTRACT.pdf - Published Version

Download (237kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4. NIM 2113121003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.pdf - Published Version

Download (262kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
5. NIM 2113121003 TABLE OF CONTENTS.pdf - Published Version

Download (64kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
6. NIM 2113121003 TABLES.pdf - Published Version

Download (127kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
7. NIM 2113121003 ILLUSTRATIONS.pdf - Published Version

Download (111kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
8. NIM 2113121003 APPENDICES.pdf - Published Version

Download (206kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
9. NIM 2113121003 CHAPTER I.pdf - Published Version

Download (334kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
13. NIM 2113121003 CHAPTER V.pdf - Published Version

Download (269kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
14. NIM 2113121003 BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf - Published Version

Download (337kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study deals with grammatical errors on students’ analytical exposition writing. This study was conducted by using qualitative design in which the data were taken from the students’ writing. The population of the study was the students of grade XI Science 1 of SMA Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi about 32 students in 2015/2016 academic year. The data of the study were obtained from the students’ writing test. The analysis found that: 1) There are four types of errors; namely omission: 135 cases (33%); addition: 103 cases (25 %); misformation: 143 cases (35 %) and misordering: 29 cases (7 %). 2) The dominant type of errors made by the eleventh grade students in writing analytical exposition text is misformation. 3) The causes of errors; Interlingual transfer contributes 56.34 % and intralingual transfer contributes 43.66 %. All types of intralingual occurred with the occurance presentation; overgeneralization contributes 38 %; ignorance of rule restriction 4%; incomplete of rule application 32 % and false concept hypothesize 26 %.

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorSumarsih, 195810211983032002
Call Number: Sk-2016 ENG 034
Keywords: Grammatical Errors; Analytical Exposition Text; Eleventh Grade Students
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni > Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris
Depositing User: Mr Maknun
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2016 05:36
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/1779

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item