potentially
misunderstanding
seen
delivering
people
treated
making
reader
CONCLUSIONS
show
teaching
intimacy
due
frequently
researcher
analyzing
idol
describing
meanwhile
knowledge
commented
daily
finding
additional
aimed
proces
compromise
applied
some
contestant
student
wa
stated
could
learning
interaction
research
factual
both
male
female
spectacular
linguistic
support
why
create
closenes
since
other
comment
talk
necessary
they
introduce
negotitate
because
gender
language
advice
concerned
give
CHAPTER
rapport
used
way
proposal
different
understanding
conduct
debate
further
study
commentator
statu
tended
lecturer
how
their
2014
increase
performance
suggested
also
but
found
english
especially
conversation
charactiristic
while
communicate
conflict
enrich
field
theory
such
independence
indonesian
SUGGESTIONS
order
following
data
after
showed
reason
difference
develop
reference
use
feeling
communication
conclusion
theorie
wherea
majoring
chatacteristic
however
suggestion
not
characteristic
did
more
speech
report
above
information