implementation
interview
insight
goal
type
observer
check
option
there
giving
everyone
matter
faced
outcome
contextual
meeting
education
directly
memorize
few
government
show
lack
even
partie
should
involve
minister
permendikna
keep
taught
interest
researcher
think
meanwhile
knowledge
index
espinosa
position
assumption
recognize
result
logic
keyword
solution
student
wa
real
stated
job
need
learner
white
375
slavin
learning
research
center
considering
survey
both
program
period
although
important
curriculum
all
NCTM
MIA6
significantly
development
limitation
support
doing
respected
including
global
countrie
complete
itself
content
mostly
nowaday
structured
developer
mathematic
self
grade
depth
kinesthetic
higher
educational
open
significant
contained
INTRODUCTION
necessary
designed
released
four
they
definition
SMA
mastery
meaningful
experience
who
topic
according
arranged
helping
2015
suggest
expected
indonesia
main
lesson
basic
action
opening
conventional
subject
odd
productive
provide
way
model
national
classmate
creativity
understanding
joyful
explain
identified
highly
benefit
presented
study
classroom
description
case
opportunite
kindergaten
integrated
about
120
creating
2014
together
increase
score
formed
changing
monitoring
operation
understand
clas
passed
happened
evident
kinship
under
answer
facilitator
communicate
81A
abilitie
group
reasoning
OECD
negeri
nation
determine
than
64th
just
effective
indonesian
fit
technology
follow
several
2000
said
data
strategie
spancer
challenging
2005
opportunity
interested
difference
skill
furthermore
assessment
work
statistic
whole
conducted
whether
vital
needed
develop
2011
activitie
communication
mathematical
conclusion
two
XI
each
PBL
senegal
variable
204
actually
criteria
identification
efficient
close
494
balige
available
doubt
semester
characteristic
one
minimum
find
method
any
material
report
considered
operational
most
look
hanita
demonstrate
had
information
developmental
objective
still
will
explained
average
fact
future
cause
teacher
aesthetic
refer
very
only
MIA1
problem
simangunsong
kagen
64thlevel
versa
into
advanced
master
solved
then
dominated
teaching
increasing
come
formula
six
quality
received
suited
often
similar
toward
value
finding
contain
hold
described
science
mr
make
proces
2013
applied
some
function
improvement
numbered
assesment
given
cultural
location
solve
ability
improve
between
competency
put
2010
centered
fully
why
know
cooperative
course
glove
variou
ideally
conceptual
using
since
concept
formulated
contrary
other
united
ever
principle
competence
another
larson
limited
friska
actively
PPLT
enhanced
select
well
because
condition
KKM
bored
level
perpetrator
suitable
capability
world
early
standar
researche
PISA
continuou
give
CHAPTER
them
used
when
background
sould
challenge
may
different
quickly
mid
examination
number
developing
realize
organization
initially
tokuhama
test
step
regulation
milli
comprehensive
their
therefore
having
question
hand
shaping
gained
2012
also
but
found
diverse
improving
reading
EFA
walle
like
got
vice
ha
ignoring
training
low
NHT
through
while
caused
based
developed
minute
authentic
school
finally
made
field
such
purpose
apply
timothy
successful
fun
see
statement
member
economic
time
maintain
framework
scientific
complex
closed
showed
international
2007
reason
KTSP
entitled
domain
math
side
solving
ethic
use
looking
door
sleeping
learn
require
essential
head
accountable
lot
EDI
mean
not
UNESCO
scope
particularly
effect
team
above
help
picture