THE INFLUENCE OF DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL TO INCREASE THE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT WITH COOPERATION AND CURIOSITY OF STUDENTS IN TEACHING OF BUFFER SOLUTION

Barus, Andre Anusta (2014) THE INFLUENCE OF DISCOVERY LEARNING MODEL TO INCREASE THE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT WITH COOPERATION AND CURIOSITY OF STUDENTS IN TEACHING OF BUFFER SOLUTION. Undergraduate thesis, UNIMED.

[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 COVER.pdf - Published Version

Download (66kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 LEMBAR PENGESAHAN.pdf - Published Version

Download (181kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 KATA PENGANTAR.pdf - Published Version

Download (224kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 ABSTRAK.pdf - Published Version

Download (187kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 DAFTAR ISI.pdf - Published Version

Download (313kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 DAFTAR TABEL.pdf - Published Version

Download (222kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 DAFTAR GAMBAR.pdf - Published Version

Download (176kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 DAFTAR LAMPIRAN.pdf - Published Version

Download (219kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 BAB V.pdf - Published Version

Download (193kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 BAB I.pdf - Published Version

Download (462kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
4103332001 DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version

Download (264kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objectives of this research are (1) to determine whether there are significant higher of the students achievement that taught by Discovery Learning model than the students achievement that taught by direct instruction method (2) To know the students chemistry achievement that taught by discovery learning model and direct instruction method (3) to investigate the percentage of the cooperation character that can be developed by using Discovery Learning model and (4) to investigate the percentage of the curiosity character that can be developed by using Discovery Learning model. The population of this research were all class in grade XI science on 2nd semester from SMAN 5 Medan. Sample was chosen by purposive random sampling and taken 2 classes from the population. The first class were used as experimental class and second class were used as control class. There were 54 students that coming from the sample. The intruments that used were 20 items of multiple choice test (evaluation test), an observation sheet of students cooperation character that has 6 indicators and an observation sheet of students curiosity character that has 4 indicators to observe the development of students character. In addition, there are questionnaires of cooperation and curiosity character to support the data of observation sheet. In experimental class, the method that used was Discovery Learning model while in control class, the method that used was Direct Instruction method. Before conducting the research, the pretest was done in both classes, and the data was tested by using homogeinity test. The result shows that the sample was homogeneous. Then the research was conducting in both of class and the observation sheet of students cooperation and curiosity character were done during the process of research in experimental class but in control class, the observation of students character was not done because the writer assumed that the development of students character does not occur if the learning process only use direct instruction method. In the last meeting the questionnaire was given to students in experimental class. The increasing of students achievement (gain) in experimental class is 79% (high) while in control class is 61% (medium). After conducting the teaching-learning process, the posttest was done in both of class. It used SPSS-16 for windows program to calculate the data while the hypothesis testing was tested by using Independent Sample T-Test with one tailed t-test.The results of research are (1) there are significant higher of the students achievement that taught by Discovery Learning model than the students achievement that taught by direct instruction method (2) The students chemistry achievement that taught by discovery learning model is better (100% could pass KKM) than taught by direct instruction method (51% could pass KKM) (3) The development of students cooperation character that taught by discovery learning model is 64.54% (medium) and (4) The development of students curiosity character that taught by discovery learning model is 59.41% (medium).

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Contributors:
ContributionNameNIP
Thesis advisorJahro, Iis Siti196510151992032003
Call Number: 541.372 071 2 Bar i
Keywords: Learning Model; Instruction Method; Character Education Buffer Solution; Cooperation Character
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Q Science > QD Chemistry
Divisions: Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam > Pendidikan Kimia
Depositing User: Mr Muhammad Iqbal
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2016 08:34
URI: http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/11585

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item